Hunt A Killer
Homicide at the Heist
Homicide at the Heist
$29.99 MSRP
Couldn't load pickup availability
When Nicky Wagner, a safecracker prodigy, is killed during a high-stakes diamond heist, his brother, Vincent, reaches out to you to catch the murderer and find the missing diamond.
You will assume the role of a private investigator trying to uncover the truth about what went wrong during the heist at the Pendersen Auction House and who could have sabotaged the plan. Along the way, you’ll investigate suspects, string together clues, and crack a few codes to unravel the mystery, find the missing diamond, and bring a killer to justice.
Difficulty
Difficulty
- Plentiful Puzzles: Puzzles that require critical reading or creating a timeline
- Challenging Ciphers: At least one challenging code or cipher
Product Details
Product Details
Player Resources
Player Resources
Share

The QR code takes you to the wrong website. And your website is incredibly difficult to navigate and is completely unhelpful I had to use chatGPT to find the proper link to get started and after we were ready to start it had already been 45 minutes and I wasn't wasting another second on this game. I will not play it or any other product you produce
What a waste of time and money. This was my first time playing these games and won’t be buying another one. Other reviews say this is the worst of them. Bummer that it is the one I picked to start.
Vague SPOILERS ahead:
Motive made no sense. His cut was going to be millions. He didn’t need the whole thing.
The doors puzzle on the map was super dumb. Vincent should have held a seance to bring his brother back to birch him out for making it so stupid. Why wouldn’t he relate it to something more personal or listed on the website?
Did loan sharks NOT want a return phone call? Why make it difficult?
Earing “left at crime scene” would mean where they found the dead body. Where does it say side door?
All crimes are about a story. I think the people who didn’t enjoy this, couldn’t figure out the story. Any good legal case requires developing a back story. All the “unnecessary” clues give you the back story and show the possibilities. Sure, go for the obvious kill, the earring at the scene, and the driver with a weapon, but you miss the Russian history and don’t figure out the bracelet, and no one mentioned the phone message….so did you get the full experience?
Move back down to Easy….this was a solid heist.
Era una gran historia que pudo ser mejor redactada, la idea era buena, sabiamos quien era el asesino, pero tardamos demasiado en abrir la caja por tantas pistas falsas, entiendo que el juego debe tener algunas trampas, pero en este creo que exageraron, me hubiera encantado que desarrolaran mejor la historia porque la idea no es mala solamente que pudo ser mucho mejor, fallamos en la solucion por las diferentes pistas, triste pero seguirmels intentando
This was so truly was so easy, but the explanations were done so poorly that it made it difficult to even clear subjects, causing much over-complication. We could have/did figure it out in the beginning, but upon opening everything it made it overcomplicated. So many useless clues and not enough actual clues. The weapons in the explanation came out of the blue; we were only given the measurements of the weapon… it was never stated what it could possibly be until we just went with our original guess,(which was very obvious before even opening up the locked box) and they gave us the official letter. If I’m wrong, tell me where half of the explanation in the letter would be found. They claimed mention of a weapon, the individuals alibi, as well as a few other things that were never brought up. “Find the motive” but there truly was no motive that could only apply to a single individual. Cool concept but poorly executed.